The Suicide of Civilization
From the Sooner Catholic, March 9, 1997
I
just found out the other day that the United States
has committed suicide as a civil society. It happened
in 1992 when the United States Supreme Court ruled
on Planned Parenthood vs. Casey. I realized this surprising
fact while listening to Dr. Russell Hittinger speak
to a combined gathering of the Catholic Physicians
Guild and the Catholic Lawyers Guild of the Archdiocese
of Oklahoma City. Professor Hittinger explained that
Justice Kennedy, a Catholic, who therefore should
have known better, wrote in Casey:
"At
the heart of liberty is the right to define one's
own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe,
and of the mystery of human life. Beliefs about these
matters could not define the attributes of personhood
were they formed under compulsion of the State."
So
what's wrong with that? Sounds pretty reasonable,
open minded, liberal, live-and-let-live, doesn't it?
Or does it?
I
asked Dr. Hittinger during the question and answer
session, that if it were true that the Supreme Court
ruled that everyone had the right to invent his own
meaning of existence, didn't that automatically abolish
all law? He answered, "Yep!" I pushed further,
"Doesn't that make subjectivism the law of the
land?" He answered, "Yep!" I asked,
"Where does that leave the Catholic Church which
purports to make claims about the nature of objective
reality?"
Clearly
it places the Catholic Church on a collision course
with the political order - or in this case, the political
disorder.
"Why
should this be so?" you might ask. Because in
the process of building the bridge from legalized
abortion to physician assisted suicide the Supreme
Court jumped off the bridge by undercutting all of
its own authority and thereby committing suicide itself.
Why
should this follow? Because if everyone has the right
to define the nature of existence, who is the Supreme
Court to tell anyone what to do?
If
I can make up my own meaning of the universe I can
make up my own laws, and who is to say if my laws
infringe on the lives and well-being of others? Should
you - or anyone - object to the laws of my universe,
what do I care? I don't recognize your authority -
or the authority of any state - to reign me in. At
that point we can cry, "Let the killing begin!"
and we have anarchy because law itself has been outlawed.
Why should this surprise us? The whole direction of
this legal process has been for just that: to let
the killing begin via physician assisted suicide.
Do not think it will stop there. Abortion didn't.
Killing has a way of spilling over its prescribed
boundaries.
In
1973 the Supreme Court gave mothers the right to use
lethal force against their unborn children for any
or no reason.
Now,
with physician assisted suicide, for which Casey has
laid the groundwork, Dr. Hittinger argues, that the
state is offering what he calls the "power of
the sword,"-that is, the authority to use lethal
force- to another segment of society, namely physicians.
Formerly such power was only in the hands of the state,
but not any individual.
Most
doctors I know are quite uncomfortable with this idea.
Imagine being sued for malpractice because you refused
to end someone's life. As Dr. Hittinger said, not
even policemen have this power. He said you can't
run up to a policeman on the street and demand that
he shoot you because you're having a bad day, are
depressed, or have a terminal illness. Why not truck
driver assisted suicide? Dentist assisted suicide?
Why not? What is to stop it if everyone is free to
invent his or her own universe with its own rules?
This
sort of makes you want to pay more attention to Pope
John Paul II's alternative vision for the third millenium
- a culture of life.
But, will it be against the law (or whatever passes
for law) to be a follower of Christ under this system?
There
are precedents.
Have
a nice day!
John Mallon is contributing
editor to Inside the Vatican magazine and an editorial
consultant and contributor to The Daily Oklahoman editorial
page. Read more about John
here!